Posted by 
Introduction
How would you feel if I told you that senescence, or ageing is a disease?
I’m deliberately being controversial. I want to spark a debate.
As I write this we are living in a world where ageing is an inevitable part of life, something as certain as death and taxes. But what if I told you that some scientists believe ageing itself could be classified as a disease?
So what’s so controversial about that, you might ask.
Well we are almost conditioned to see ageing as a natural process, a gentle winding down of the biological clock.
But what if that ticking could be slowed down?
Now that opens up a messy mud pile of controversial issues.
In this blog, we’re diving into a provocative idea: the case for reclassifying aging—also known as senescence—as a disease. This reclassification could revolutionise how we think about growing old, opening doors to new treatments and, perhaps, a longer, healthier life for everyone. But it’s not without its challenges. So, let’s explore this idea together.
1. Understanding Ageing, or Senescence
First things first: what exactly is ageing? Biologically speaking, ageing, or senescence, refers to the gradual deterioration of functional characteristics that occurs over time. It’s what happens when our cells stop dividing, our DNA accumulates damage, and our tissues start to lose their elasticity.
Traditionally, ageing has been seen as distinct from disease. Ageing is considered a normal, inevitable process, whereas diseases are viewed as deviations from this norm—abnormal conditions that cause dysfunction or suffering.
But when you think about it, senescence certainly ticks many of the boxes we use to define disease. It leads to increased susceptibility to illness, diminishes our physical and cognitive abilities, and ultimately results in death.
The question is: why isn’t it already classified as a disease?
Scientists have identified several hallmarks of ageing, including telomere shortening (which limits how many times a cell can divide), mitochondrial dysfunction (leading to less efficient energy production), and the accumulation of senescent cells (cells that no longer function properly). These are all things we associate with disease, so why not with ageing?
2. The Argument for Reclassifying Senescence as a Disease
Now, let’s get to the heart of the argument. Why should we consider reclassifying ageing as a disease?
For starters, recent scientific advances suggest that senescence isn’t just a passive process we have to accept. We’re beginning to understand the mechanisms behind ageing, and more importantly, how we might intervene in these processes.
If we think of ageing as a disease, it suddenly becomes something we can potentially treat or even reverse. This shift in perspective is revolutionary.
Think about the criteria that typically define a disease: it’s something that causes dysfunction, suffering, and increases the risk of mortality. Ageing fits this bill perfectly.
It impairs bodily functions, leads to a decline in quality of life, and, without fail, results in death. If a condition that causes all these things isn’t a disease, then what is?
If we think of ageing as a disease, it suddenly becomes something we can potentially treat or even reverse. This shift in perspective is revolutionary.
Reclassifying ageing as a disease could have enormous benefits. It could lead to more research funding specifically aimed at understanding and treating the ageing process.
Pharmaceutical companies might develop drugs to slow or even stop ageing, just as they develop treatments for heart disease or diabetes. Public health strategies could shift towards preventing the onset of age-related conditions before they ever appear.
3. Counterarguments: Challenges and Ethical Considerations
Of course, this isn’t a straightforward issue. There are significant counterarguments to consider, and some of them raise important ethical questions.
One of the most common objections is the idea that ageing is a natural process, not a disease. People might argue that ageing is simply part of the human experience, and that medicalising it could lead to over-intervention in what should be a natural, even dignified, aspect of life. If we start treating ageing as a disease, where does it end? Will every wrinkle and grey hair become a medical issue?
There’s also the concern of over-medicalisation. In an age where more and more aspects of human life are being treated as medical problems, do we really want to add ageing to the list?
Some fear that by classifying ageing as a disease, we might encourage a culture that sees any deviation from youthful vitality as something to be corrected, rather than accepted.
If we start treating ageing as a disease, where does it end? Will every wrinkle and grey hair become a medical issue?
Then there are the ethical and social implications. What happens if we develop treatments that can significantly delay ageing? Who gets access to these treatments?
Could this lead to a greater divide between the rich and poor, with only the wealthy able to afford to stay young while the rest age and die as before?
And what about the impact on population dynamics? If people start living significantly longer, what will that do to our already overburdened planet?
4. Case Studies and Examples
To better understand the potential of reclassifying ageing as a disease, let’s look at some current research and interventions.
Scientists are already exploring ways to slow or reverse aspects of ageing. Senolytics, for example, are drugs that target and destroy senescent cells, which are cells that have stopped functioning properly and contribute to ageing and age-related diseases. Early studies in animals have shown that senolytics can extend lifespan and improve health in old age.
Another promising area is gene therapy. Researchers are experimenting with ways to repair or replace damaged DNA, potentially addressing one of the root causes of ageing.
Similarly, caloric restriction mimetics are drugs that mimic the effects of a low-calorie diet, which has been shown to extend lifespan in various species.
If we look back at history, we see that other conditions once thought to be natural parts of life have been reclassified as diseases.
For example, mental health disorders were once seen as a natural consequence of stress or bad upbringing, rather than diseases that could be treated. The reclassification led to significant advances in treatment and understanding, much as we might see with ageing.
Early studies in animals have shown that senolytics can extend lifespan and improve health in old age.
Different cultures also have varying perspectives on ageing. In some societies, ageing is revered and seen as a sign of wisdom and experience, while in others, youth is prized above all else. These cultural attitudes influence how we approach the idea of ageing as a disease, and whether such a reclassification would be accepted or rejected.
5. The Future of Ageing Research
So, where does this leave us? The future of ageing research is incredibly exciting, with innovative approaches on the horizon that could change everything we know about growing old.
One area to watch is the use of artificial intelligence in ageing research. AI could help us identify new biomarkers of ageing, predict how individuals will age, and develop personalised anti-ageing treatments.
Advanced genomics is another promising field, where scientists are exploring how to manipulate genes to extend healthy lifespan.
But with these advances come significant policy implications. If we reclassify ageing as a disease, it could lead to major changes in healthcare policy, insurance, and regulation.
Governments might need to rethink how they allocate resources for ageing populations, and how they regulate new treatments aimed at extending life.
Public perception is also crucial. How would reclassifying ageing as a disease change the way we view older people?
Could it reduce ageism by promoting the idea that ageing is something that can be managed and treated, rather than feared? Or might it reinforce negative stereotypes, making ageing seem even more undesirable?
Explore This Topic Further
If this topic interests you, I would encourage you to read Lifespan: Why We Age – and Why We Don’t Have To by David Sinclair. You can read my review of this book here.
Conclusion
In this blog, we’ve explored the provocative idea of reclassifying ageing as a disease. We’ve seen that, from a biological standpoint, ageing shares many characteristics with what we typically define as a disease.
We’ve also considered the potential benefits of such a reclassification, as well as the ethical and social challenges it might raise.
Ultimately, whether we choose to classify ageing as a disease or not, one thing is clear: our understanding of ageing is changing rapidly. We’re on the brink of breakthroughs that could transform how we experience growing old.
But with these possibilities come difficult questions. How should we approach the inevitable changes to our bodies and minds? Should we fight against ageing with every tool at our disposal, or should we embrace it as a natural part of life?
As we move forward, it’s crucial that we think critically about these questions and the implications of our answers. Whether you see ageing as a disease or a natural process, one thing is certain: the future of ageing is going to be anything but boring.
Your views on this topic are welcomed in the comments below.